Senator Byrd's Endorsement

This goes beyond a mere endorsement and is of historic symbolism:


"As people all across this great nation know, I have been one of the most outspoken opponents of the Bush Administration's misguided war in Iraq and its saber rattling around the globe."

"With the Bush Administration's latest request to fund this on-going war in Iraq without any attempt to start bringing our troops home, the issue of the upcoming presidential contest has been weighing heavily on my heart. The loss of life continues and the sons and daughters of tens of thousands of American families remain in harm's way every day."

"This Democratic primary campaign has been tough and competitive. I had no intention of involving myself in the Democratic campaign for President in the midst of West Virginia's primary election. But the stakes this November could not be higher."

"After a great deal of thought, consideration and prayer over the situation in Iraq, I have decided that, as a superdelegate to the Democratic National Convention, I will cast my vote for Senator Barack Obama for President. Both Senators Clinton and Obama are extraordinary individuals, whose integrity, honor, love for this country and strong belief in our Constitution I deeply respect."

"I believe that Barack Obama is a shining young statesman, who possesses the personal temperament and courage necessary to extricate our country from this costly misadventure in Iraq, and to lead our nation at this challenging time in history. Barack Obama is a noble-hearted patriot and humble Christian, and he has my full faith and support."



Display:


Re: Senator Byrd's Endorsement (2.00 / 2)

It's been a great day for Obama. Everything is coming together.
It all going great.
Obama/Warner 2008
by MissVA on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:28:58 PM EST

Re: Senator Byrd's Endorsement (2.00 / 1)

I know I've raised this before without any comment from you, but it is your signature line and I would really love to know why you think havnig a Republican next in line for the WH is a positive thing for the Democratic party.  I'm not trying to be a pain in the butt, but really do not understand the reasoning here, since you clearly are a Democrat.


by mady on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:34:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Senator Byrd's Endorsement (2.00 / 1)

I've seen other people also that prefer a centrist candidate for VP because of their potential cross-over appeal.  As far as republican's go Hagel is about as centrist as they get.  

(not that he would be my first (or second) choice, but there is some logic in selecting him... (although personally I think they (as in all republicans) should be voted out for the next lifetime after these last 7+yrs)


by herenow on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:46:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Senator Byrd's Endorsement (none / 0)

The thing is I don't see Chuck Hagel with him being a republican and all; but he's an anti-Iraq Vietnam vet, he can bring home NE and help solidify Barack's support in western swing states, AND this choice fits right in with Barack's message of bipartisanship and change.

Obama's whole message is about unity so Hagel ticket would put that in action.


Obama/Warner 2008
by MissVA on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:49:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Senator Byrd's Endorsement (none / 0)

I like Hagel.  At the very least, I really hope he becomes part of Obama's cabinet or administration in some capacity.

The only issue I have with him is that he's pretty socially conservative, on the other hand, I'm not aware of him trying to force his beliefs on others, a trait all too common in today's Republican party.


by RussTC3 on Mon May 19, 2008 at 03:17:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Is Byrd a super? (2.00 / 1)

If not, it doesn't really help Obama. Smart move for Byrd though; a great way to clear his name after all these years.

FYI; WV already voted.


by soyousay on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:30:51 PM EST

Yes he is (2.00 / 2)

all Democratic members of Congress are supers.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:33:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Yes he is (1.00 / 2)

According to Obama, I thought supers were suppose to vote with their state.


by soyousay on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:59:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Yes he is (2.00 / 1)

So maybe you should go argue with Sen. Byrd then.


by PhilFR on Mon May 19, 2008 at 03:02:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Yes he is (1.00 / 2)

Obama supporters flip flop on this issue.


by soyousay on Mon May 19, 2008 at 03:04:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

No... (2.00 / 1)

What I think supers should do is irrelevant. They have the power to choose as they will. (And we have the power to lobby them, though I doubt a Colorado voter like me has much sway with Sen Byrd.)

And it seems to me it was Clinton who argued so strongly that supers should vote their conscience. How does that sit with you now?


by PhilFR on Mon May 19, 2008 at 03:06:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: No... (none / 0)

I've always said they should vote their conscience.


by soyousay on Mon May 19, 2008 at 03:23:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

When did he say that? (2.00 / 1)


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Mon May 19, 2008 at 03:04:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: When did he say that? (none / 0)

His campaign didn't say this? Maybe it was Obama supporters.


by soyousay on Mon May 19, 2008 at 03:35:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

No he didn't say that (none / 0)

and Clinton supporters said the same thing and still the ones who do can't explain Mike Easley, Joe Sestak, John Baldacci, Daniel Inouye, Stephanie Tubbs-Jones, Martin O'Malley, Ruth Ann Miller, Sheila Jackso-Lee, etc.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Mon May 19, 2008 at 03:38:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

God you're ignorant (1.60 / 5)

When you have to ask whether a sitting U.S. senator is a superdelegate then you display a level of ignorance unequaled on this site.

To answer your third grade question:  Yes, yes he is.  He's a super from the heart of Appalachia that could give Obama a boost in the general election with that segment of the population.

This is a very, very HUGE show of support.


I'm riding the Low Road Express. Join me at www.lowroadexpress.com
by LtWorf on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:33:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Jeez there was no need to be rude (2.00 / 2)

Not everyone is a political wonk. Asking a question doesn't make one stupid, being afraid to does.


by DSloth on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:40:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

This person has been more (1.66 / 3)

than an antagonist. They've brushed off every significant thing Senator Obama has done and continues to beat the drum of "Obama will lose."

If someone's going to go around talking about Obama will lose, they better know that the senior Democrat in congress is a Superdelegate or their opinion is going to be ridiculed.


Commissar: Canadian Gal; Proletariat Policemen: ragekage, Lord Hadrian. "For the Proletariat!"
by Lord Hadrian on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:43:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Clinton supporter's candidate has lost (2.00 / 1)

so their going to be a little unhinged for awhile. The fact is we do need these people, just like they'd have needed us if Clinton had won. Eventually most of them will come around, more so if we turn the other cheek more often.


by DSloth on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:51:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This person has been more (2.00 / 1)

I have a job to go to every evening...I don't have time to study politics 24/7 like you do.


by soyousay on Mon May 19, 2008 at 03:18:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

My job (none / 0)

is the study of politics, so I know it pretty well.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Mon May 19, 2008 at 03:39:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This person has been more (none / 0)

This comment didn't have anything in it that needed to be hidden did it?

being able to study politics for 24/7 isn't an insult. (at least I hope not, I get close to that number myself...)


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Ernst on Mon May 19, 2008 at 03:54:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This person has been more (none / 0)

She troll-rated me for no reason. And so I returned the favor.


Commissar: Canadian Gal; Proletariat Policemen: ragekage, Lord Hadrian. "For the Proletariat!"
by Lord Hadrian on Mon May 19, 2008 at 04:03:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jeez there was no need to be rude (1.00 / 1)

See below.  It's the only reason I slapped him down so hard.


I'm riding the Low Road Express. Join me at www.lowroadexpress.com
by LtWorf on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:45:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: God you're ignorant (none / 0)

Heh, like most people really heard about supers prior to this election.


by soyousay on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:58:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: God you're ignorant (1.00 / 1)

Ummm so what's your excuse?   You've had five months to learn the definition of "superdelegate" and their role in the process?  Once again: you're ignorant.


I'm riding the Low Road Express. Join me at www.lowroadexpress.com
by LtWorf on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:59:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: God you're ignorant (2.00 / 1)

Why are you counting on Super delegates that haven't actually voted yet?


by soyousay on Mon May 19, 2008 at 03:01:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: God you're ignorant (1.00 / 1)

Sorry guy:  You are what they say you are...TROLL...you are also persona non-grata.  Of course, I suspect you don't know what that means either.


I'm riding the Low Road Express. Join me at www.lowroadexpress.com
by LtWorf on Mon May 19, 2008 at 03:48:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Is Byrd a super? (2.00 / 1)

it is another example when supers going against will of the people.


Welcome to a Landslide without white Working class, Latinos, Women, Seniors and holding-on sweeties
by engels on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:34:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Yes it is (2.00 / 3)

just like Mike Easley, Stephanie Tubbs-Jones, Joe Sestak, Patty Murray, Maria Cantwell, Daniel Inouye, John Baldacci, Martin O'Malley, right?

RIGHT?


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:37:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Didn't You Get the Memo? (2.00 / 0)

It's only OK for supers to go against the will of the people when they are going for Hillary.  That's how it works. Would you try to remember that in the future? ;)


I'm riding the Low Road Express. Join me at www.lowroadexpress.com
by LtWorf on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:40:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Everytime engles says this (2.00 / 1)

I will respond with the names of Clinton supporters whose constituents supported Obama.

Hypocrites just PISS me off.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:44:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

go to dkos than (1.33 / 3)

and take kerry, kennedy and richardson with you


Welcome to a Landslide without white Working class, Latinos, Women, Seniors and holding-on sweeties
by engels on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:49:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Either answer my question (1.00 / 1)

or shut up, you're being a hypocrite.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:54:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: go to dkos than (none / 0)

Huh? Maybe you don't understand the point of MyDD: to help elect Dems.


by PhilFR on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:57:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

btw I'm not leaving (none / 0)

I'm going to keep calling you out on your bullshit until you stop sprewing bullshit.

you don't have a right to be a hypocrite.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:58:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Is Byrd a super? (2.00 / 2)

Just like all those SDs that endorsed up to a year before ANY votes where cast eh?


by notedgeways on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:49:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Rofl. (2.00 / 4)

Asking if the longest serving Senator in Democratic history is a superdelegate is like asking whether Barack Obama will win the nomination.

If you don't know, you have no idea how the process work.

Senator Byrd is the President Pro Tem of the Senate, 4th in line to the Presidency after Representative Pelosi and Dick Cheney.

He is obviously a superdelegate and as Senator Clinton has espoused on numerous occasions, a Superdelegate doesn't have to follow the will of the voter and in fact should overturn it so she can win.

It's just not working as planned.


Commissar: Canadian Gal; Proletariat Policemen: ragekage, Lord Hadrian. "For the Proletariat!"
by Lord Hadrian on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:34:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Is Byrd a super? (2.00 / 2)

He is a SD at least two ways. As everyone has been saying he is a senator which makes him a super. he is also considered a DPL, which also qualifies him. Gonna be a SD until he passes away (many years from now eh?), or they change the rules.


by notedgeways on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:48:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Is Byrd a super? (none / 0)

I think Sen. Byrd cleared his name many years ago through excellent service to social progress.


by PhilFR on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:59:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

It's still a big deal (none / 0)

much like when Orville Fabus endorsed Jesse Jackson.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Mon May 19, 2008 at 03:00:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Senator Byrd's Endorsement (2.00 / 2)

Yes Senator Byrd is a super delegate. He is also a super Democrat because unlike Hilllary and like Obama, he had the courage and judgment to oppose the Iraq war from the beginning.


We shall overcome. Yes we can.
by Sam Wise Gingy on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:33:35 PM EST

Re: Senator Byrd's Endorsement (none / 0)

Honestly, and not to diss Obama, but more to praise Senator Byrd

Byrd far surpassed any candidate that ran with his anti-war stance.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Ernst on Mon May 19, 2008 at 04:00:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Senator Byrd's Endorsement (2.00 / 0)

Read or listen to the speech Senator Byrd gave on the eve of the IWR it should be apparent why he could not endorse Clinton. It is the same reason I could not support her.


by grasshopper on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:42:58 PM EST

Re: Senator Byrd's Endorsement (2.00 / 1)

I do not think that Byrd's endorsement 'clears his name' or any such thing.  Any blot on his character has been effectively erased by his decades of service to all the citizens of this country and by his candid address of his past in recent years.  The historic symbolism of this endorsement does not have to do with him as an individual.  Rather it's symbolic because it's about more than him, it shows how far we've come as a society.  If a former Klan activist from a border state can dedicate himself to fighting poverty and racism and then embrace the candidacy of a black man with Arabic and African names, then we can have a realistic hope of reaching the goal of consigning racism to the dustbin of American history.


The future is unwritten
by Strummerson on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:48:39 PM EST

Re: Senator Byrd's Endorsement (none / 0)

A Byrd Endorsement for Obama will help Obama improve his standing among Hardworking White Voters.


by nkpolitics on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:49:13 PM EST

Re: Senator Byrd's Endorsement (2.00 / 1)

Well, it's a great endorsement, but it brings to mind an Adam Sandler quote from The Wedding Singer:

"Once again, things that could've been brought to my attention YESTERDAY!"


by Johnny Gentle Famous Crooner on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:49:17 PM EST

Re: Senator Byrd's Endorsement (2.00 / 1)

Ben Smith at Politico pulled a wonderful quote out of Audacity of Hope about Byrd:


Listening to Senator Byrd I felt with full force all the essential contradictions of me in this new place, with its marble busts, its arcane traditions, its memories and its ghosts. I pondered the fact that, according to his own autobiography, Senator Byrd had received his first taste of leadership in his early twenties, as a member of the Raleigh County Ku Klux Klan, an association that he had long disavowed, an error he attributed--no doubt correctly--to the time and place in which he'd been raised, but which continued to surface as an issue throughout his career. I thought about how he had joined other giants of the Senate, like J. William Fulbright of Arkansas and Richard Russell of Georgia, in Southern resistance to civil rights legislation. I wondered if this would matter to the liberals who now lionized Senator Byrd for his principled opposition to the Iraq War resolution--the MoveOn.org crowd, the heirs of the political counterculture the senator had spent much of his career disdaining.

I wondered if it should matter. Senator Byrd's life--like most of ours--has been the struggle of warring impulses, a twining of darkness and light. And in that sense I realized that he really was a proper emblem for the Senate, whose rules and design reflect the grand compromise of America's founding: the bargain between Northern states and Southern states, the Senate's role as a guardian against the passions of the moment, a defender of minority rights and state sovereignty, but also a tool to protect the wealthy from the rabble, and assure slaveholders of noninterference with their peculiar institution. Stamped into the very fiber of the Senate, within its genetic code, was the same contest between power and principle that characterized America as a whole, a lasting expression of that great debate among a few brilliant, flawed men that had concluded with the creation of a form of government unique in its genius--yet blind to the whip and the chain.


by Piuma on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:53:36 PM EST

Re: Senator Byrd's Endorsement (2.00 / 2)

I was so delighted to read of Byrd's endorsement and not just because of his strong opposition to the IWR (and beautiful, powerful speech opposing it).

It's also historic because it speaks to the possibility of human growth and change.  Senator Byrd recounts in his autobiography that he began his political career out of his leadership position in the KKK.  He opposed the integration of the military and filibustered civil rights legislation.

And now, today, he's endorsing the man who will be, in all likelyhood, the first African American nominee for President.

Even if he weren't a super delegate his endorsement would mean a lot.


the third eye does not weep. it knows.
by mijita on Mon May 19, 2008 at 02:56:32 PM EST

Thank you Senator Byrd. (2.00 / 6)

I know that the love of the Constitution you share with Barack Obamam prompted this.

As a 60 year old black woman - this is even more meaningful to me than it may be to other folks here.

We are all capable of change.


Anthropologists for human diversity; opposing McCain perversity
by NeciVelez on Mon May 19, 2008 at 03:07:51 PM EST

Talk about hope (2.00 / 2)

As a 52 you old woman who is a redemptive optimist this endorsement touches me deeply.


Ida B. The rule is perfect: in all matters of opinion our adversaries are insane.-Mark Twain
by Ida B on Mon May 19, 2008 at 07:14:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Senator Byrd's Endorsement (2.00 / 3)

This is a very nice endorsement. :)

I hope he is well enough and willing to campaign for Obama in the GE.  Perhaps if the people of WV get to know Obama better through not just Obama, but surrogates such as Byrd, they'll be more inclined to vote for him.  He could also be used quite effectively in other rural states.


by RussTC3 on Mon May 19, 2008 at 03:19:15 PM EST

Re: Senator Byrd's Endorsement (2.00 / 1)

Good for Obama.

A real nice get.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Ernst on Mon May 19, 2008 at 04:01:07 PM EST

Re: Senator Byrd's Endorsement (none / 0)

In Nine Years When Senator Robert C. Byrd turns 100. Which Senator will be giving a toast to Robert C. Byrd. In 2008 when Robert C. Byrd endorsed Barack Obama for President, We supported him and rightfully so. Had rest of the country followed our lead. We would not be having all these problems like we are having right now.


by nkpolitics on Mon May 19, 2008 at 04:45:47 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.